Supreme Court Relief For Karnataka Officer

The matter is to be heard subsequent after three weeks.

New Delhi:

In a reduction for senior Karnataka cop Seemanth Kumar Singh and bureaucrat J Manjunath, the Supreme Court at the moment stayed observations made by Karnataka High Court calling the previous a “tainted officer” and the Karnataka Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) a “collection centre”.

Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, whereas directing the High Court to resolve on the bail matter afresh, mentioned that these observations had been unconnected to the case, and never throughout the ambit of the proceedings.

“Conduct of the Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) officer is unconnected to the case that was being heard. Rather than considering the bail application, the judge focused on other things which may not be relevant and beyond the scope,” he mentioned.

Karnataka Additional Director General of Police Seemanth Kumar Singh and Indian Administrative Services officer J Manjunath had moved the highest court docket searching for expunction of “adverse” remarks of Karnataka High Court decide HP Sandesh which had been made through the listening to of a bribery case. They additionally sought a keep on the proceedings.

Justice Sandesh had questioned why Mr Manjunath, the then Bengaluru Urban Deputy Commissioner, was not made an accused within the bribery case.

Besides antagonistic oral observations, the HC decide had issued instructions starting from searching for experiences on prosecution/closure of circumstances, probed by the ACB, since 2016 and summoning confidential service information of the Additional Director General of Police whereas contemplating the common bail utility of an accused , the highest court docket was instructed by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, showing for the state authorities.

IAS officer J Manjunath, who’s presently in jail within the bribery case, mentioned that a few of the observations had been made towards him with out giving him a chance to characterize himself.

The plea mentioned, “The High Court has lost sight of the fact that such remarks at nascent stages of investigation have a disastrous bearing on the fair probe and judicious conclusion of the criminal proceedings, including his right to remedy of bail,” and added that he has been subjected to media trial resulting from these remarks.

The decide later claimed to have obtained a risk of switch after his remarks.

“Allegations made by the judge are a different matter and we don’t want to give an impression that we are favoring one side,” the CJI mentioned.

The matter is to be heard subsequent after three weeks.

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.